In anticipation of this afternoon’s protest, NOISE & COLOR interviewed Judge Baugh

In anticipation of this afternoon’s protest, NOISE & COLOR interviewed Judge Baugh

News of the former Billings schoolteacher who received a 31-day sentence after admitting to raping a 14-year-old student has traveled far and fast. Media outlets, including CNN, USA Today, and the Huffington Post (to name a few), have all picked up the issue since the Billings Gazette broke its story on Tuesday. The rapist, 54-year-old Stacey Rambold, failed to meet the terms of a deferred prosecution agreement requiring him to complete a three-year sex offender treatment program, among other conditions. Rambold violated the terms of this agreement and appeared before Yellowstone County District Court Judge G. Todd Baugh for a sentencing hearing on Monday.

Judge Baugh has suffered public criticism as a result of the sentencing ruling, particularly in regard to the statements he made during the hearing. Judge Baugh stated that the 14-year-old victim was “older than chronological age” and “in as much control as Rambold”.

At the time of writing, a petition requesting Judge Baugh resign from his position lists 30,022 digital signatures. That number rises by the second. A Facebook page called “Impeach Judge G. Todd Baugh” boasts 1082 “likes”. 600 people have RSVP’d for the upcoming protest on the event page for “Stand with the Victim – A Protest Against Judge Baugh”.

Billings resident Sheena Rice organized the protest after learning of Judge Baugh’s remarks during the Rambold hearing. “When I heard that this girl was basically asking for it, that she was ‘older than her chronological age’, that she was just as much in control of the situation, it sounded like he was saying that to me.” Rice, a victim of sexual assault, wants to “get to a place where we’re not blaming the victim and we’re talking about what the actual issue is: the rapist.”

Judge Baugh’s post will be up for re-election in 2014. If he is re-elected, he would serve his sixth consecutive term. NOISE & COLOR was fortunate enough to sit down with the judge Tuesday morning. Judge Baugh’s first words on the subject were those of unsolicited apology and remorse: “I didn’t get much sleep last night. Aside from having to apologize to the entire female population, we all say stupid stuff. I obviously said what I said on Monday, but I don’t know what I was trying to say. What I said was dumb.” He said he sent a letter of apology to the Billings Gazette that morning. Throughout the discussion, Baugh remained stalwart in his efforts to apologize and self-deprecate, referring to his remarks during the sentencing hearing as “dumb,” “stupid,” and “idiotic” multiple times. At one point, he said, “I apologize for my ineptness.”

However regretful his comments, the judge stands by his Monday decision to sentence Rambold to 31 days of imprisonment, the remaining term of his fifteen year sentence being suspended. Rambold will also have to register as a sex offender. Judge Baugh made substantial effort to explain what he considers to be a point of confusion about the case. According to Judge Baugh, the purpose of Monday’s hearing was simply to sentence Rambold for violating the terms of his prosecution agreement, not to sentence Rambold for the original crime (sexual intercourse without consent). In the face of controversy, this distinction is the basis for his continued self-justification.

For many, an apology is not enough. Public outcry has not subsided; it has only grown. National news outlets are expected to cover the protest this afternoon.

“Even with the apology, those words were part of the sentence and some of the job of the justice system should be about protecting those who are hurt,” Rice said. “I really feel that this girl did not receive justice. If Judge Baugh’s defense is that the hearing was just about violating the deal, then why did he even talk about her? This doesn’t need to be vigilante justice but I think we need to hold our elected officials to a higher standard. When they do something that really goes against what they’re supposed to be doing, they should step down.”

When asked to comment on the protest that will occur on the courthouse lawn, Judge Baugh responded, “If that’s based on my stupid comments, I totally agree with [the protestors]. They were stupid comments. If it’s based on what I think I see as a sentencing on what I totally see as a rape, it’s their right to complain and protest. If I was in their position, I’d probably join in.”


written by Pete Tolton

Share This


  1. Jordan Webber

    It is the responsibility for the people to hold those in positions of power accountable for their actions, and the protest was an excellent way to begin. As it stands, while the Honorable Judge Baugh is correct in his statement that this was not a rape case, the fact remains that Rambold blatantly violated the terms of his agreement, willingly put himself in a position to reoffend after being kicked out of treatment. At this point the full weight of his crime should have come down upon his shoulders, i.e. a full 20 year sentence. He had his second chance and he blew it, we should not have given him a third. Further, this isn’t the first time Judge Baugh has been overly lenient for serious infractions, including a suspended jail sentence for a woman who was convicted for her 13th DUI with the warning “If you drink and drive and kill someone, you will spend some real time in prison”(, these are but a few example of a list of questionable at best sentences.

    Judge Baugh has shamed Montana as a whole with his sentence and statements on an international level (the BBC has not been kind to our fair state), and it is now clear he is no longer able to uphold the will of the people or carry out the law. At this point, it his responsibility to acquiesce to the will of the people and step down before he disgraces our state further.

  2. MIchael

    Sitting there saying “I’m dumb.” over and over again isn’t enough. He should probably resign, I mean, Billings wouldn’t vote for him AGAIN would they? WOULD THEY?

  3. Keson

    I don’t think people realize how many sex offenders do not get jail time for their first offence….. what’s really sad about all of this is that still isn’t an issue I’m hearing about. Why isn’t every other sex offender that didn’t have to do any time being discussed?

    Why isn’t the girl’s home environment being under more scrutiny? How she end up that way? We are too busy getting angry over a technicality and not seeing the biggest problem here, which is the broken sex offender correctional program we have. It’s embarrasingly loose (does anyone remember Nathaniel Bar-Jonah?) and entirely too lenient on the offenders.

    This judge gave that sick man more time than many rapist who have done more henious things have recieved, where is the outcry for those victims, many whom are still alive?

    I wish this sort of public passion would be pointed in a more constructive direction, but since this situation has a “bad guy” already to point the finger at, I don’t think that is going to happen. Instead of directing all this anger at a man who is merely a spoke on the wheel in a system already to swivel-headed, why not press further into the bigger picture?

    Here’s hoping you can stop seeing red long just enough to see thewhole picture, B-Town. I tip my glass in hopes of your fair luck.

    1. Patrish

      What the hell does home life of the teenager have to do with a 40+ man taking advantage of a 14 year old by having sex with her?? It’s still rape under the law. A teenager is allowed to have poor judgment, a full grown man who is a teacher is suppose to use his head. So is the judge that sentenced him. Beside this is not the only ‘bad’ sentencing or bad comment’ Baugh has made his career. While the system might be lacking in many ways, we always focus on the ones the anger us the most.

  4. Lee Rindal

    Our “social-media” seems to put our cries and demands for “justice” into hyper-drive well in advance of knowing “the rest of the story” (to borrow a saying from Paull Harvey). Please don’t overlook that the ciminal sentence “handed down” from the Court was “negotiated” between the State of Montana and Stacey Rambold, not Judge Baugh.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>